A recent tweet from @OneJoblessBoy aimed a pointed criticism at Seyi Tinubu, remarking:
“We are no longer afraid… and to Seyi Tinubu, after viewing your video where you spoke like a primary school head boy. Just so you know, your father’s position as President does not automatically qualify you as a youth leader…”
Such criticism is commonplace in Nigeria, where public figures, particularly those associated with politicians, often face backlash. However, let’s be honest—if Seyi Tinubu were merely a wealthy individual indulging in extravagant vacations, the same critics would likely be saying, “These children of politicians are indifferent to our struggles.”
The truth is, regardless of public opinion, Seyi Tinubu has been actively involved with young Nigerians. Through his Renewed Hope Youth Empowerment Initiative, he has established platforms aimed at fostering youth development. Recently, in Sokoto State, Governor Ahmad Aliyu publicly recognized his contributions, stating that his initiatives “will enhance gender balance, promote productive activities, and increase youth engagement in politics.”
Moreover, his efforts extend beyond mere rhetoric. He has initiated feeding programs for the underprivileged and provided support for individuals with disabilities. In Kano, during Ramadan, he organized an Iftar for hundreds and launched a sustainable feeding initiative. This demonstrates tangible impact rather than just social media chatter.
see more: The Togo Government is Reviewing VAT Exemptions.
It’s easy to downplay his contributions by claiming, “Well, his father is the president, so he has access to power.” However, not every child of a politician is making a meaningful contribution. Many are living in luxury, detached from the realities faced by ordinary Nigerians. In contrast, Seyi is actively engaging with young people, connecting with communities, and genuinely striving to effect change.
Is he flawless? No. Does being the president’s son mean he inherently represents all young Nigerians? Certainly not. But should he be evaluated solely on his family name rather than his actions? That’s where the debate lies.
